El Marco Legal de los Delitos Cibernéticos en Ecuador

Luis Alberto  Ordóñez Córdova

doi:10.59282/reincisol.V3(5)1447-1469

Authors

Luis Alberto Ordóñez Córdova Doctor en Jurisprudencia y Abogado de los Tribunales y Juzgados de la República. https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1378-1575

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59282/reincisol.V3(5)1447-1469

Keywords:

cybercrime, COIP, privacy protection, data integrity, cybersecurity.

Abstract

The regulation of cybercrimes in Ecuador has evolved significantly since the promulgation of the Law on Electronic Commerce, Electronic Signatures and Data Messages in 2002. Subsequently, in 2014, specific provisions were included in the Comprehensive Organic Criminal Code (COIP) that defines and sanctions various computer crimes, such as unauthorized access to computer systems and data interception. Effective implementation of these provisions requires adequate training of law enforcement and the judicial system. In 2021, the Personal Data Protection Law was enacted, establishing a comprehensive legal framework for the protection of personal data.

New legislation, such as the creation of a National Cybersecurity Agency, has been proposed to coordinate efforts at the national level, and international cooperation has also been vital. Ecuador has participated in international agreements and forums on cybersecurity. Future challenges include the need for a specific law that covers all aspects of cybercrime and the adaptation of international regulations such as the European Union's GDPR to improve the protection of citizens' privacy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Agrafiotis, I., Nurse, J. R. C., Goldsmith, M., Creese, S., & Upton, D. (2018). A taxonomy of cyber-harms: Defining the impacts of cyber-attacks and understanding how they propagate. Journal of Information Security and Applications, 34, 100–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisa.2017.11.003

Andrade, A. L. P., Bustamante, P. P., & Villagómez Cabezas, R. Í. (2019). Toma de decisiones y responsabilidad penal frente al lavado de activos en Ecuador. Revista de Derecho, 14, 365–384. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-33992019000200365

Brenner, S. W. (2010a). Cybercrime: Threats, response, and assessment. Global Crime, 11(4), 407–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/17440572.2010.519558

Brenner, S. W. (2010b). The importance of international cooperation in cybersecurity. Global Crime, 11(3), 367–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/17440572.2010.502894

Broadhurst, R., & Chang, L. Y. C. (2017). Introduction to the special issue on cybersecurity and cybercrime. Asian Journal of Criminology, 12, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-017-9252-4

Broadhurst, R., Grabosky, P., Alazab, M., & Chon, S. (2014). Policing cybercrime: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism, 9(1), 26–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/18335330.2014.903298

Bygrave, L. A. (2014). The influence of European data privacy law beyond Europe: Implications for globalization of convention 108. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 28(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600869.2014.944092

Cárdenas-Heredia, M. C., & Vázquez-Calle, J. (2021). Vulneración al principio de progresividad y no regresividad del beneficio penitenciario semiabierto, en las reformas al Código Orgánico Integral Penal en el Ecuador. Revista FIPCAEC, 6, 3–32. https://doi.org/10.23857/FIPCAEC.V6I1.329

Chang, W.-K. (2010). International cooperation in combating cybercrime and terrorism: Case study of Korea. Journal of Cyber Law and Policy, 15, 75–108. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1827837

Clough, J. (2015a). Principles of cybercrime. Law and Policy, 37(3), 213–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12025